Skip to content
Get free consultation!

Bidding Wars: Navigating Multiple Offers on a Property

What Property Buyers Need to Know About the Contract for Sale #29: How do I handle multiple offers on a property?

Introduction

Managing multiple offers on a property can be a complex process for both buyers and sellers. In a competitive real estate market like New South Wales (NSW), multiple offers are a common occurrence, and handling them effectively is crucial to achieving the best outcome. This section explores the strategies for handling multiple offers, the legal implications involved, and practical considerations for navigating this situation.

Understanding Multiple Offers

When a property attracts multiple offers, the seller is presented with several options to consider. Multiple offers can occur in any market but are more common in areas with high demand and limited supply, such as Sydney and other parts of NSW. Understanding how to manage these offers can help ensure a fair and transparent process while maximizing the sale price.

  1. Best and Final Offer: The seller may ask all interested parties to submit their best and final offers by a certain deadline. This approach can create urgency and encourage buyers to present their most competitive bids.

  2. Private Negotiation: The seller may choose to negotiate privately with one or more buyers. This strategy allows the seller to assess the strength of each offer and negotiate terms that best suit their needs.

  3. Auction: In some cases, the seller may decide to proceed to auction, where the competitive nature of the bidding process can drive up the price.

Legal Considerations in NSW

Handling multiple offers in NSW requires adherence to specific legal standards to ensure a fair and transparent process. The following are key legal considerations:

  1. Disclosure Requirements: Under NSW law, sellers and their agents must disclose all material facts that could affect a buyer's decision to purchase the property. This includes any known defects, encumbrances, or pending development applications.

  2. Anti-Gazumping Laws: While NSW does not have strict anti-gazumping laws, the practice is generally discouraged. Gazumping occurs when a seller accepts a verbal offer from one buyer and then accepts a higher offer from another buyer before the contract is signed. To protect against gazumping, buyers should aim to exchange contracts as soon as possible after an offer is accepted.

  3. Cooling-Off Period: In NSW, there is a five-business-day cooling-off period for residential property purchases, allowing buyers to withdraw from the contract. However, this period does not apply in auctions.

  4. Confidentiality and Fair Dealing: Real estate agents must maintain confidentiality regarding the details of each offer. They are also required to act in the best interests of their client, whether it be the buyer or the seller, and must comply with the rules set by NSW Fair Trading.

Strategies for Sellers When Handling Multiple Offers

  1. Clarify Your Priorities: Determine what is most important to you – price, settlement terms, or other conditions such as a quick sale or a leaseback option. This will help guide your decisions when evaluating offers.

  2. Communicate Clearly with All Parties: Keep all interested parties informed throughout the process. Transparency helps maintain trust and can prevent misunderstandings or disputes.

  3. Consider a “Blind Bidding” Process: In a blind bidding process, buyers are unaware of other offers. This can create a sense of competition and may encourage higher bids. However, it can also lead to dissatisfaction if buyers feel they were not given a fair chance.

  4. Leverage Multiple Offers to Improve Terms: Use the leverage created by multiple offers to negotiate favorable terms. This might include requesting a higher price, shorter settlement period, or fewer contingencies.

  5. Avoid Gazumping: While legally permissible, gazumping can harm your reputation and may lead to legal disputes. Consider implementing a fair and transparent process to avoid this issue.

The following case study is a creative attempt by CM Lawyers to illustrate and educate the issues which may arise in a real court case. The case, characters, events, and scenarios depicted herein do not represent any real individuals, organizations, or legal proceedings.

Case Study: Multiple Offers on a Property in NSW – A Complex Negotiation

Case Overview

In the case of Smith v. Wang [2019] NSWSC 456, the sale of a high-demand property in Sydney's inner west resulted in a complex negotiation involving multiple offers. The property, a two-bedroom terrace house, attracted significant interest due to its prime location and potential for renovation. The seller, Ms. Smith, received five offers within three days of listing the property, leading to a heated competition among buyers.

Behaviour of the Participants

The buyers, eager to secure the property in a competitive market, began to increase their offers significantly. One buyer, Mr. Wang, initially submitted an offer $50,000 above the asking price, only to be outbid by another buyer shortly after. In a desperate attempt to secure the property, Mr. Wang escalated his offer three more times within 24 hours, eventually reaching a bid that was $150,000 above the original asking price. His anxiety was palpable, as he feared losing out on his dream home in a fast-moving market.

Ms. Smith, the seller, found herself overwhelmed by the sheer number of offers and the intensity of the bidding war. Uncertain of how to proceed, she sought advice from her real estate agent, who recommended a best and final offer approach to conclude the process quickly. However, this decision did not sit well with all buyers, some of whom felt that they had not been given a fair opportunity to negotiate.

Legal Process and Court Involvement

One of the buyers, feeling misled by the agent's handling of the multiple offers, filed a complaint with NSW Fair Trading, alleging a lack of transparency and fair dealing. The complaint triggered an investigation into the practices of the agent and the handling of the multiple offers. After several months of inquiry, the court found that while the agent had acted within the bounds of the law, the communication with buyers could have been clearer to avoid any perceptions of unfairness.

Financial Consequences

The property was eventually sold to Mr. Wang for $1.35 million, well above the initial asking price of $1.2 million. However, the protracted negotiation and subsequent investigation resulted in additional costs for Ms. Smith, including legal fees of approximately $20,000 and a delay in the settlement period, which led to financial inconvenience as she waited to purchase another property. Additionally, two other buyers filed minor claims for reimbursement of expenses incurred during the negotiation process, citing misleading communication by the agent.

Statistics

  • Market Demand: Approximately 25% of properties in Sydney receive multiple offers within the first week of listing.

  • Auction Success Rates: In NSW, auction clearance rates in competitive markets can reach up to 80%.

  • Gazumping Incidents: An estimated 15% of NSW property sales involve cases of gazumping, where a higher offer is accepted after an initial verbal agreement.

  • Cooling-Off Period Utilization: About 10% of buyers in NSW exercise their right to withdraw during the cooling-off period.

  • Blind Bidding Impact: Properties sold using a blind bidding process in NSW achieve a 5-10% higher final sale price on average.

  • Complaint Frequency: NSW Fair Trading receives approximately 500 complaints annually related to the handling of multiple offers.

  • Agent Fines: Real estate agents in NSW can face fines up to $22,000 for failing to comply with disclosure requirements.

  • Legal Disputes Duration: The average time to resolve a dispute involving multiple offers in NSW is 6-12 months.

  • Financial Impact on Sellers: Sellers in NSW dealing with multiple offers may incur additional costs ranging from $5,000 to $30,000 due to extended negotiation periods.

  • Buyers’ Losses: Buyers involved in unsuccessful negotiations due to lack of transparency may face costs of up to $10,000 for inspections, legal advice, and related expenses.

Government Resources

Non-Profit Organisations