Skip to content
Get free consultation!

What are the tax implications of separation?

< Back

CM Law's Ultimate 50 List - Separated Couples FAQ #11:
What are the tax implications of separation?

Introduction

Separation can be an emotionally taxing process, but it's also crucial to understand the financial and tax implications that accompany it. In Australia, and specifically in New South Wales (NSW), separation affects various aspects of taxation, from capital gains tax (CGT) to superannuation and stamp duty. Understanding these implications can help individuals make informed decisions during this challenging time.

1. Capital Gains Tax (CGT) and Separation

Principal Residence Exemption

When couples separate, the family home often becomes a central point of negotiation. The principal residence exemption usually allows couples to sell their home without incurring CGT. However, during a separation, this exemption may apply differently depending on the situation.

For example, if one partner moves out but retains an interest in the property, they can still claim the exemption for up to six years under certain conditions. If the property is transferred between partners as part of the settlement, the exemption generally continues, provided the home remains the primary residence of one of the parties.

Investment Properties and CGT

Investment properties held by couples can present a more complex scenario. Typically, transferring an investment property from one partner to another triggers a CGT event, which may result in a tax liability. However, under the Family Law Act 1975, a CGT rollover relief may be available, deferring the tax until a later date. This relief applies only to settlements formalized through a court order or binding financial agreement.

2. Superannuation and Separation

Splitting Superannuation

Superannuation is often one of the most significant assets in a marriage or de facto relationship. In Australia, superannuation can be split upon separation, although it is not automatically divided. Instead, separating couples must negotiate how they will handle their superannuation.

The splitting of superannuation is treated as a transfer rather than a withdrawal, meaning it doesn't trigger immediate tax consequences. However, the receiving party may face tax implications upon accessing their super in the future, depending on their age and the conditions of release.

3. Stamp Duty Considerations

Transfers of Property

In NSW, stamp duty is generally payable when property ownership is transferred. However, transfers made as part of a formal separation agreement may be exempt. To qualify for the exemption, the transfer must be made under a binding financial agreement or a Family Court order.

Other Assets

Stamp duty may also apply to other assets, such as cars or shares, transferred during separation. As with property, exemptions or concessions may apply if these transfers are part of a formal settlement.

4. Tax Deductions and Liabilities

Shared Income and Deductions

During a relationship, couples often share income and claim joint deductions. After separation, each party is generally responsible for their tax liabilities. This can result in different tax outcomes, especially if one party has been the primary income earner or has claimed significant deductions.

Child Support and Tax

Child support payments are generally not tax-deductible for the payer nor considered taxable income for the recipient. However, child support agreements can have indirect tax implications, such as affecting eligibility for certain tax offsets and benefits.

The following case study is a creative attempt by CM Lawyers to illustrate and educate the issues which may arise in a real court case. The case, characters, events, and scenarios depicted herein do not represent any real individuals, organizations, or legal proceedings.

Case Study: Re Estate of Taylor [2018] NSWSC 1134

Background

In the case of Re Estate of Taylor [2018] NSWSC 1134, a lengthy and bitter separation battle ensued between the former spouses, John and Mary Taylor. The couple, married for over 20 years, owned multiple properties, substantial investment portfolios, and considerable superannuation. John, a successful businessman, and Mary, who had taken a step back from her career to raise their children, faced a complicated financial disentanglement upon their separation.

Behaviour of the Participants

The separation was marked by intense emotions and accusations. Mary accused John of hiding assets and failing to disclose his full financial situation, while John accused Mary of exaggerating her financial needs. The tension escalated to a point where Mary, feeling desperate and betrayed, claimed she had no means to support herself or the children without John's financial disclosure. John, on the other hand, was determined to retain as much of his hard-earned wealth as possible, fearing that Mary's demands were driven by a desire for revenge rather than need.

The court was presented with a litany of accusations and counter-accusations, creating an emotionally charged atmosphere that reflected the desperation of both parties to protect their financial interests. This emotional turmoil not only prolonged the proceedings but also increased the financial burden on both parties as they each sought to outmaneuver the other.

Legal Process and Court Involvement

The case was brought before the NSW Supreme Court, where both parties sought to resolve the division of assets and liabilities. The court examined evidence from both sides, including financial statements, property valuations, and superannuation balances. It became clear that the lack of cooperation between the parties had significantly complicated the process.

The court found that John's failure to provide complete financial disclosure constituted a breach of his duty to the court and his former spouse. Consequently, the court ordered a thorough forensic examination of John's finances, which revealed several previously undisclosed bank accounts and investment properties.

Financial Consequences

The financial consequences of this case were substantial. The prolonged legal battle resulted in over $600,000 in legal fees and court costs, which were deducted from the marital estate. This included the cost of forensic accounting services required to uncover John's undisclosed assets.

In terms of assets, the couple's investment properties and a luxury home in Sydney's eastern suburbs were of particular significance. The court ordered the sale of the luxury home, which had appreciated significantly in value since its purchase. However, the market conditions at the time of sale were not favorable, resulting in a lower-than-expected sale price. This, combined with the hefty legal fees, led to a significant reduction in the net estate available for distribution.

The court also ordered a division of the superannuation assets, with Mary receiving a substantial portion to offset her lower earning capacity and career sacrifices made during the marriage.

Lessons Learned

This case highlights several critical lessons for individuals undergoing separation:

  1. Full Disclosure is Essential: Failing to disclose all assets can lead to increased scrutiny, additional costs, and potential legal penalties.

  2. Cooperation Reduces Costs: The more adversarial the process, the higher the financial and emotional toll. Cooperation can lead to quicker and less costly resolutions.

  3. Market Conditions Matter: The timing of asset sales, particularly real estate, can significantly impact the financial outcome of a separation.

Statistics

  1. Executor Mismanagement: Approximately 10% of estate disputes in NSW involve allegations of executor misconduct or mismanagement, leading to legal action to remove the executor.

  2. Removal Cases: Around 5-7% of probate cases in NSW result in the removal of an executor due to misconduct, delay, or conflict of interest.

  3. Legal Costs: The costs associated with removing an executor in NSW can range from $50,000 to over $500,000, depending on the case complexity.

  4. Time Delays: Removing an executor can extend estate administration by 12-24 months, with complex cases taking even longer.

  5. Financial Impact: Estates involved in executor disputes often see a 15-25% reduction in value due to legal fees and delays.

  6. Separation-Related Super Splitting: Approximately 30% of separated couples opt to split superannuation assets.

  7. Property Settlements: Over 60% of separation cases involve the sale of the family home.

  8. Stamp Duty Exemptions: In NSW, about 40% of property transfers during separation are exempt from stamp duty under formal agreements.

  9. Child Support Payments: Around 70% of separated parents agree to a private child support arrangement rather than use government services.

  10. Tax Liabilities: About 25% of separated individuals face unexpected tax liabilities post-separation due to the transfer of investment assets.

Government Resources

Non-Profit Organisations