Serving as an executor of an estate is a demanding role, involving significant responsibilities in managing and distributing the assets of the deceased. In recognition of this effort, executors may be entitled to receive a commission, a payment for their services. However, the calculation and approval of this commission can be a complex and sometimes contentious aspect of the probate process, raising important questions about fairness and the appropriate compensation for the executor’s work.
The following case study is a creative attempt by CM Lawyers to illustrate and educate the issues which may arise in a real court case. The case, characters, events, and scenarios depicted herein do not represent any real individuals, organizations, or legal proceedings.
Case: *Roberts Estate v Roberts* [2023] NSWSC 456.
In 2022, after the passing of Helen Roberts, a successful businesswoman from Sydney, her son John was appointed as the executor of her estate. While John took on the role with a sense of duty, managing his mother’s $5 million estate proved to be an overwhelming task. As the probate process progressed, John’s request for an executor’s commission sparked a heated debate among the beneficiaries, who questioned the fairness and amount of the proposed payment.
John’s siblings, who were the primary beneficiaries, felt that the commission John was requesting was excessive given that he was also receiving a substantial inheritance. The family’s differing opinions on what constituted fair compensation led to a legal dispute, with the beneficiaries seeking the court’s intervention to resolve the matter.
In New South Wales, an executor’s commission is not automatic; it must be approved by the Supreme Court or agreed upon by all beneficiaries. The commission is typically calculated as a percentage of the estate’s value, ranging from 1% to 5%, depending on the complexity of the estate and the work performed by the executor. The court considers various factors, including the size of the estate, the time and effort expended by the executor, and the level of skill required to manage the estate.
In John’s case, the court had to determine whether his request for a 3% commission on the $5 million estate—amounting to $150,000—was reasonable. The court examined the tasks John had completed, including managing the sale of real estate, handling investment accounts, and dealing with creditor claims.
The approval of an executor’s commission has direct financial implications for both the executor and the beneficiaries. For John, receiving the commission was a way to be compensated for the significant time and effort he had invested in managing his mother’s estate. For the beneficiaries, however, the commission reduced the amount of their inheritance, leading to concerns about fairness and the potential for conflict.
The court’s decision in such cases can set important precedents for how executor commissions are handled, balancing the need to fairly compensate the executor with the rights of the beneficiaries to receive their full inheritance.
In the case of *Roberts Estate v Roberts* [2023] NSWSC 456, the Supreme Court of New South Wales approved John’s request for a 2.5% commission, slightly lower than what he had initially sought. The court acknowledged John’s extensive work on the estate but also took into account the concerns of the beneficiaries. The final commission amounted to $125,000, which was deducted from the estate before distribution.
This case highlights the complexities involved in determining an appropriate executor’s commission. Executors should keep detailed records of their work and be prepared to justify their requests for compensation. Beneficiaries, on the other hand, should understand the legal basis for executor commissions and be aware of their rights to challenge excessive claims. Clear communication and legal guidance can help prevent disputes and ensure a fair resolution for all parties involved.
executor commission, executor's commission, executor and probate, executor delaying probate, executor dies after probate granted, executor dies before probate, executor grant of probate, executor loses capacity after probate, executor not applying for probate, executor renouncing probate, grant of probate executor, how long can an executor delay applying for probate, how long does an executor have to apply for probate, paying deceased bills before probate, probate affidavit of executor, probate and executor, probate and executors, probate executor, probate executor duties, probate executor of estate, probate executor responsibilities, probate shares, probate vs executor, who applies for probate, who can apply for a grant of probate, who can apply for grant of probate, who can apply for probate, who can probate a will, who can put a caveat on probate, who does probate, who does probate when someone dies, who grants probate, who handles probate, who has to apply for probate, who has to do probate, who has to go through probate, who needs probate, who pays for probate, who pays for probate costs, who pays probate, who pays probate fees, who pays probate in australia, who probates a will, who values house contents for probate, why would an executor delay probate