When purchasing off-the-plan in NSW, buyers often anticipate their property will be ready on time and within budget. However, supply chain disruptions are becoming an increasingly common issue that can derail these expectations. From shortages of building materials to delays in shipping and construction equipment, supply chain problems can cause significant delays, push up costs, and even lead to project cancellations.
In recent years, global and local supply chain disruptions—driven by factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions, and shipping bottlenecks—have created a challenging environment for property developers. These disruptions affect the availability of essential materials like timber, steel, and concrete, as well as fixtures and appliances. For buyers, the consequences of supply chain issues can range from long settlement delays to increased costs as developers pass on the higher expenses.
In this article, we’ll explore the impact of supply chain issues on off-the-plan developments in NSW, share a real case where buyers faced significant delays and cost increases due to material shortages, and provide strategies for protecting yourself from these risks.
1. Shortages of Building Materials
One of the most widespread supply chain issues affecting the construction industry is the shortage of key building materials such as timber, steel, and concrete. These shortages can halt construction altogether or cause developers to switch to alternative, sometimes more expensive materials, which can delay timelines and increase project costs.
2. Delays in Shipping and Logistics
Global shipping delays and bottlenecks have affected the timely delivery of imported materials and appliances. Many developers rely on international suppliers for specialized materials, fixtures, and fittings, and disruptions in the supply chain can lead to extended delays as shipments are held up at ports or in transit.
3. Labor Shortages
In addition to material shortages, labor shortages—caused by health crises, travel restrictions, or increased demand for skilled workers—can further delay the completion of off-the-plan projects. Even if materials are available, a lack of qualified workers to install or construct elements of the property can push back the settlement date.
4. Increased Costs
When materials and labor are in short supply, prices rise. Many developers have faced significant increases in the cost of building materials, which they may attempt to pass on to buyers in the form of higher prices or additional fees. Buyers who signed contracts at fixed prices may not be directly impacted, but projects that exceed the budget can still face delays or even cancellation.
5. Appliance and Fixture Shortages
Appliances, fixtures, and other finishing elements are often sourced internationally. Supply chain disruptions can delay the delivery of these items, preventing developers from completing the final stages of the project. Buyers may find themselves waiting long after the expected settlement date for items such as kitchen appliances, light fixtures, or bathroom fittings to be installed.
Supply chain issues can lead to various financial and legal challenges for off-the-plan buyers:
Introduction
In Brown v XYZ Developments [2022] NSWSC 987, a group of buyers in an off-the-plan apartment complex in Sydney faced significant delays and increased costs due to widespread supply chain disruptions. The case highlights the financial and emotional strain that buyers can experience when projects are delayed by material shortages and rising construction costs.
Executor’s Mismanagement
The buyers had signed contracts for off-the-plan apartments in a development located in Sydney’s western suburbs. Construction was initially on track, but by mid-2021, global supply chain disruptions began to affect the availability of key materials, including timber and steel. Shipping delays compounded the issue, and the developer struggled to source the materials needed to complete the project on time.
As the delays mounted, the developer informed the buyers that the project would be delayed by at least nine months. Furthermore, due to the rising cost of materials, the developer attempted to pass on additional charges to the buyers, despite the fact that many had signed fixed-price contracts. This led to frustration and financial stress for the buyers, some of whom had already made plans to move into their new homes.
The buyers, alarmed by the delay and the prospect of increased costs, contacted the developer to negotiate. Some buyers requested compensation for the delay, while others sought to enforce their fixed-price contracts and avoid the additional fees. However, the developer insisted that the delays and cost increases were due to “unforeseen circumstances” and that they were within their rights to adjust the contract.
Several buyers sought legal advice, hoping to force the developer to honor the original contract terms or to seek compensation for the financial losses caused by the delay.
The buyers filed a class action against the developer, arguing that the delays and additional charges constituted a breach of contract. They claimed that the developer had failed to adequately plan for supply chain disruptions and that they should not be held financially responsible for issues outside their control.
The court reviewed the evidence, including correspondence between the buyers and the developer, as well as industry reports detailing the widespread nature of the supply chain disruptions. Ultimately, the court ruled that the developer had acted within its contractual rights, as the delays were due to global factors beyond its control.
While the court did not award compensation to the buyers, it did require the developer to honor the fixed-price contracts for those buyers who had signed such agreements.
The financial consequences for the buyers were considerable. Many faced increased living costs due to the extended delay, including additional rent or bridging loans. Some buyers experienced financial stress as they struggled to manage these costs while waiting for their apartments to be completed. While they avoided paying additional charges, the delay itself caused significant financial strain.
For the developer, the project’s costs ballooned due to the rising price of materials, forcing them to absorb the increased expenses. The delays also damaged the developer’s reputation, as frustrated buyers shared their negative experiences.
Government Resources
Non-Profit Organisations