Strata management plays a crucial role in ensuring the smooth operation and maintenance of residential apartment buildings, particularly in NSW, where off-the-plan purchases are common. For buyers of these properties, understanding how strata management functions and the potential pitfalls is essential. Strata management, also known as body corporate management, involves the day-to-day upkeep of common areas, setting budgets, and managing the finances of the strata scheme. However, when strata management goes wrong, it can result in financial disputes, neglected maintenance, and a breakdown of community harmony.
Many off-the-plan buyers fail to consider the implications of poor strata management. The marketing materials often focus on the benefits of owning a brand-new apartment, with little mention of the long-term costs associated with maintaining common property. Buyers may also overlook the complexities involved in sharing decision-making with other owners through an owners’ corporation, which is responsible for appointing the strata manager.
In this article, we will delve into the issues surrounding strata management, its potential legal and financial consequences, and a real NSW court case illustrating the dangers of mismanaged strata in off-the-plan purchases.
What is Strata Management?
Strata management refers to the administration of apartment complexes or multi-dwelling buildings where the property is divided into "lots" (the individual apartments) and "common areas" (shared spaces such as hallways, elevators, gardens, and pools). A strata manager is employed by the owners’ corporation to manage these shared spaces, collect levies, and oversee the building’s maintenance and finances.
The Role of a Strata Manager
Strata managers are responsible for various administrative tasks, such as:
While a good strata manager can ensure the smooth operation of a building, poor management can lead to financial mismanagement, neglected maintenance, and unresolved disputes between owners.
Inexperienced or Incompetent Managers
When a building is first constructed, the developer often appoints a strata manager. In some cases, this manager may not have the experience or capability to manage a complex, especially larger developments with significant shared facilities. Poor management can result in rising costs, misallocation of funds, or neglected repairs.
Conflicts of Interest
A common issue in off-the-plan developments is that the developer retains control over the strata management contract for a certain period after the building is completed. This can create conflicts of interest where the developer’s priorities, such as reducing initial costs, clash with the long-term interests of the owners. For example, a developer may cut corners by appointing a strata manager who is lenient on enforcing maintenance standards.
Inadequate Sinking Fund Contributions
The sinking fund is a reserve used to pay for major capital works, such as roof repairs, elevator replacement, or repainting of common areas. A well-funded sinking fund is essential to avoid special levies, where owners are required to contribute large sums at short notice to cover unexpected repairs. In off-the-plan developments, sinking funds are often underfunded in the early years, leading to financial strain on owners when large repairs become necessary.
Introduction
In Brown v XYZ Strata Management [2020] NSWSC 874, a group of owners in a newly developed off-the-plan apartment building in Sydney brought legal action against their strata manager and the developer for financial mismanagement and neglect of the property’s common areas. This case highlights the consequences of poor strata management in off-the-plan purchases.
Executor's Mismanagement
The buyers were initially attracted to the luxury apartment complex, which featured high-end amenities such as a gym, swimming pool, and rooftop garden. However, within two years of moving in, the owners began to notice significant issues with the building’s maintenance and financial management. The strata manager, appointed by the developer, had failed to allocate sufficient funds to the sinking fund, and as a result, there were insufficient reserves to address necessary repairs to the elevators and common plumbing.
The owners also discovered that the strata manager had been inflating the costs of routine maintenance, including cleaning and gardening services, by awarding contracts to companies owned by their relatives. This resulted in overcharging for services, further depleting the building’s funds.
The owners, initially unaware of the financial mismanagement, began to experience mounting frustration as maintenance issues piled up. Leaks in the common areas went unrepaired for months, and the elevators frequently broke down. Despite numerous complaints to the strata manager, no action was taken. Owners were forced to cover repairs out of their own pockets, adding financial strain to what had been sold as a “luxury living experience.”
As frustration turned into desperation, the owners organized meetings to address the issues. However, the strata manager was uncooperative, often failing to attend meetings or provide financial reports. Owners felt trapped, as many had purchased their apartments as long-term investments and could not easily sell due to the building’s poor reputation. Desperation grew as the building’s value began to decline, leaving the owners facing financial loss.
The owners’ corporation eventually sought legal advice and decided to take the strata manager and the developer to court. They filed a claim for financial mismanagement, alleging that the strata manager had breached their fiduciary duties by failing to maintain the common property and properly manage the building’s finances.
The court reviewed the financial records and found clear evidence of mismanagement. The judge noted that the strata manager had failed to provide regular financial statements, had overcharged for maintenance services, and had not established a proper sinking fund. The developer was also held partially liable for appointing an incompetent strata manager without proper oversight.
The court ordered the strata manager to pay compensation to the owners’ corporation, amounting to $450,000 to cover the costs of overdue repairs and the establishment of a proper sinking fund. Additionally, the owners were forced to contribute special levies to cover the shortfall in the building’s finances. For many owners, this financial burden was significant, with some needing to sell their apartments at a loss.
Among the assets sold to cover debts were personal properties, and several owners faced foreclosure due to their inability to meet mortgage payments. The financial consequences of poor strata management extended beyond immediate repair costs, with the building’s value decreasing by 15% due to its damaged reputation in the market.
Government Resources
Non-Profit Organisations