Buying off-the-plan in NSW offers the allure of securing a property at today’s prices, with the promise of future value growth. However, the reality for many buyers is that rising costs can turn a once-attractive investment into a financial burden. These cost increases, which may occur during the construction phase or at settlement, can lead to unexpected financial strain, reduce the overall return on investment, and even leave some buyers unable to complete their purchase.
Rising costs can take many forms: increased construction costs passed on by developers, unexpected settlement fees, higher loan interest rates, and inflated maintenance charges. The long timeframes between signing the contract and settling the property can leave buyers vulnerable to market changes and cost escalations. For investors, this can erode the profitability of the property, while owner-occupiers may find themselves struggling to meet the rising financial obligations associated with their new home.
In this article, we’ll explore the various rising costs that can impact off-the-plan purchases in NSW, present a real case where buyers faced significant financial pressure due to cost increases, and provide strategies for mitigating these risks and protecting your financial position.
1. Construction Cost Increases
Developers may face rising construction costs due to increased prices for building materials, labor shortages, or unexpected delays. These higher costs are often passed on to buyers in the form of contract variations or additional fees, even if the buyer initially signed a fixed-price contract.
2. Loan Interest Rate Rises
Off-the-plan purchases often have long settlement periods, during which interest rates may rise. Buyers who secured pre-approval for a loan based on lower rates may find that their borrowing capacity has decreased by the time settlement occurs, resulting in higher mortgage repayments or the need to renegotiate loan terms.
3. Increased Strata or Maintenance Fees
After the development is completed, buyers may face higher-than-expected strata fees or maintenance costs, particularly if the building has complex amenities or requires ongoing repairs. These fees can reduce the profitability of an investment property or strain the finances of owner-occupiers.
4. Unexpected Settlement Fees
Buyers may encounter additional settlement costs, such as legal fees, taxes, or developer charges, that were not fully disclosed at the time of signing the contract. These costs can quickly add up, leaving buyers scrambling to meet their financial obligations.
5. Rising Insurance Premiums
Insurance costs can also rise during the construction period or after settlement, particularly for properties in high-risk areas or those with higher security or maintenance requirements. This can further increase the ongoing costs of owning the property.
Rising costs can have severe financial and legal consequences for off-the-plan buyers:
Introduction
In Johnson v XYZ Developments [2021] NSWSC 1552, a group of off-the-plan buyers in a Sydney apartment development faced significant financial strain due to rising costs during the construction phase. The case highlights how cost escalations can turn a promising investment into a financial burden.
Executor’s Mismanagement
The buyers had purchased off-the-plan apartments in a high-rise development marketed as a luxury living experience with state-of-the-art amenities. However, during construction, the developer encountered increased material and labor costs, which they passed on to the buyers through contract variations and additional fees.
Some buyers were caught off guard by the cost increases, as they had signed what they believed were fixed-price contracts. As a result, they were forced to come up with additional funds to cover the rising costs or risk losing their deposits. For investors, the higher purchase prices and increased strata fees significantly reduced the profitability of the property.
The buyers, shocked by the sudden increase in costs, attempted to negotiate with the developer to reduce or eliminate the additional fees. However, the developer argued that the cost increases were due to market conditions beyond their control, and they refused to adjust the contract terms. Several buyers sought legal advice, hoping to challenge the cost increases or recover some of their financial losses.
As the settlement date approached, some buyers struggled to secure financing at the higher purchase price, particularly as interest rates had risen during the construction period. A few buyers were unable to complete the purchase and lost their deposits, while others faced increased mortgage repayments that stretched their finances thin.
Several buyers filed a class action against the developer, arguing that the cost increases were not adequately disclosed in the contract and that the developer had failed to provide clear information about the potential for rising costs. They sought compensation for the financial strain caused by the unexpected fees.
The court reviewed the evidence, including correspondence between the buyers and the developer, as well as expert testimony on construction cost inflation. While the judge acknowledged the buyers’ frustration, the court found that the developer had acted within its legal rights by including a clause in the contract allowing for cost adjustments due to market changes. The buyers were not awarded compensation.
The financial consequences for the buyers were severe. Many faced increased mortgage repayments, higher strata fees, and unexpected settlement costs, which stretched their finances. Some buyers lost their deposits after being unable to secure financing, while others experienced reduced rental yields due to the increased costs associated with the property. Despite their financial hardship, the court did not award compensation, leaving the buyers to absorb the full impact of the rising costs.
Government Resources
Non-Profit Organisations