blog

Prenuptial agreements must be valid and fair; otherwise, they can be contested.

Written by andrew@brokerpedia.com.au | Sep 7, 2024 6:40:45 PM

Back

CM Law’s Ultimate 50 Things You Need to Know About Property Settlement During Divorce #19.
What if there is a prenuptial agreement?

Introduction

Avoid These Common Pitfalls During Property Settlement

Introduction

Prenuptial agreements, also known as Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs) in Australia, play a crucial role in property settlements. In New South Wales (NSW), a prenuptial agreement outlines how assets and financial resources will be divided in the event of a separation or divorce. However, not all prenuptial agreements are upheld by the court. This article explores the factors that influence the enforceability of a prenuptial agreement, the potential pitfalls to avoid, and provides a real NSW case study to illustrate the complexities involved.

What If There Is a Prenuptial Agreement?

  1. Understanding Prenuptial Agreements in Australia A prenuptial agreement is a legal document entered into by a couple before marriage or during a relationship, outlining the division of assets, liabilities, and financial resources in the event of a separation or divorce. Under the Family Law Act 1975, prenuptial agreements in Australia are known as Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs). These agreements can cover various financial matters, including property division, spousal maintenance, and the treatment of inheritances or business interests.
  2. Legal Requirements for a Valid Prenuptial Agreement For a prenuptial agreement to be legally binding and enforceable in NSW, the following requirements must be met:
    • Voluntary Agreement: Both parties must enter the agreement freely and voluntarily, without any duress or coercion.
    • Independent Legal Advice: Each party must obtain independent legal advice from a qualified lawyer about the advantages and disadvantages of the agreement.
    • Full Financial Disclosure: Both parties must provide full and frank disclosure of their financial position, including all assets, liabilities, and income.
    • Written Agreement: The prenuptial agreement must be in writing, signed by both parties, and include a statement confirming that they have received independent legal advice.
    • Compliance with Formalities: The agreement must comply with all formal requirements under the Family Law Act 1975.

  3. Circumstances Under Which a Prenuptial Agreement Can Be Set Aside A prenuptial agreement may be set aside by the court under certain circumstances, including:
    • Fraud or Misrepresentation: If one party misled the other or failed to disclose all relevant financial information, the agreement may be invalidated.
    • Duress or Coercion: If one party was pressured, coerced, or forced into signing the agreement, the court may set it aside.
    • Unconscionable Conduct: If the agreement is found to be grossly unfair or one-sided, it may be set aside on the grounds of unconscionable conduct.
    • Changed Circumstances: If there has been a significant change in circumstances since the agreement was made, such as the birth of a child or a drastic change in financial position, the court may set it aside to prevent hardship.

  4. Common Pitfalls in Prenuptial Agreements
    • Lack of Full Financial Disclosure: Failing to provide full and frank disclosure of all assets and liabilities can render a prenuptial agreement invalid.
    • Inadequate Legal Advice: If both parties do not receive independent legal advice or if the advice is inadequate, the agreement may not be enforceable.
    • Unfair or Unreasonable Terms: Agreements that are perceived to be grossly unfair or that do not adequately provide for the needs of one party may be set aside by the court.
    • Failure to Update the Agreement: Failing to update the prenuptial agreement in light of significant changes in circumstances can lead to its invalidation.

  5. Strategies for Ensuring a Valid Prenuptial Agreement
    • Obtain Independent Legal Advice: Both parties should seek independent legal advice to understand the implications of the agreement.
    • Provide Full Financial Disclosure: Ensure that all financial information is fully disclosed and documented.
    • Regularly Review and Update the Agreement: Review and update the agreement periodically, especially after major life events, to ensure its ongoing validity.
    • Ensure Fair and Reasonable Terms: Draft the agreement in a way that is fair, reasonable, and considers the future needs of both parties.

  6. Seek Professional Guidance Engaging a family lawyer experienced in drafting prenuptial agreements can help ensure that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable. A lawyer can provide guidance on meeting the legal requirements and protecting the interests of both parties.

Case Study: Enforceability of a Prenuptial Agreement in New South Wales

Introduction

The case of Wallace v. Wallace [2022] NSWSC 1894 demonstrates the complexities involved in determining the enforceability of a prenuptial agreement. This case involved a substantial asset pool and a disputed prenuptial agreement, leading to a lengthy legal battle and significant financial consequences for both parties.

Case Overview

John and Emily Wallace were married for 15 years and owned several properties, including a family home in Vaucluse, Sydney, valued at $7 million, multiple investment properties, a portfolio of shares, and a successful business. Before their marriage, John insisted on a prenuptial agreement to protect his business and personal assets. The agreement was drafted with the assistance of John's lawyer, and Emily signed it shortly before their wedding. Upon their separation, Emily sought to have the prenuptial agreement set aside, claiming she had not received adequate legal advice and that the agreement was unfair.

Behaviour of the Participants

John, a successful entrepreneur, was determined to enforce the prenuptial agreement to protect his business and personal assets. He believed that the agreement was fair and that Emily had willingly signed it before their marriage. His frustration grew as Emily contested the agreement, leading him to take a firm stance to uphold its terms. His emotional state was marked by defensiveness and a determination to protect his financial interests.

Emily, a homemaker and primary caregiver, felt betrayed and overwhelmed by the terms of the prenuptial agreement, which left her with a minimal share of the assets. She argued that she had been pressured into signing the agreement without fully understanding its implications. Her desperation intensified as she feared being left without adequate financial support after the divorce. Determined to secure a fair outcome, she pursued legal action to have the agreement set aside.

Legal Process and Court Involvement

The case proceeded to the NSW Supreme Court, where Emily argued that the prenuptial agreement should be set aside due to inadequate legal advice, lack of full financial disclosure, and unconscionable conduct. The court required both parties to provide evidence, including testimony from their lawyers and financial documents.

The court found that Emily had not received independent legal advice and that John had failed to disclose all relevant financial information. Additionally, the court considered the agreement's terms to be unfair and unreasonable, given the length of the marriage and Emily’s role as a homemaker and primary caregiver. As a result, the court set aside the prenuptial agreement and ordered a re-evaluation of the asset pool to achieve a fair settlement.

Financial Consequences

The court proceedings lasted over 24 months, incurring substantial legal fees and costs for both parties. The court ordered that the asset pool be re-evaluated to include all assets, including those covered by the prenuptial agreement. Emily was awarded 55% of the total assets, including a share of the family home, investment properties, and superannuation. The court’s decision led to a significant financial adjustment, with John retaining a smaller portion of the assets than he had anticipated.

The legal costs associated with the dispute exceeded $400,000, significantly impacting both parties' financial positions. The prolonged litigation also caused delays in accessing the funds, further affecting their financial stability.

Conclusion

The Wallace v. Wallace case illustrates the complexities involved in enforcing prenuptial agreements in property settlements. It demonstrates the importance of meeting the legal requirements, providing full financial disclosure, and ensuring that the terms of the agreement are fair and reasonable.

Lessons Learned

  1. Ensure Independent Legal Advice: Both parties must receive independent legal advice to understand the implications of the agreement.
  2. Provide Full Financial Disclosure: Full disclosure of all financial information is essential to ensure the agreement's validity.
  3. Draft Fair and Reasonable Terms: Ensure that the agreement's terms are fair and consider both parties' future needs.
  4. Regularly Review and Update the Agreement: Review and update the prenuptial agreement after major life events to maintain its enforceability.
  5. Prepare for Litigation Costs: Be prepared for the potential financial and emotional costs of disputes involving prenuptial agreements.

Statistics

  1. Approximately 20% of property settlements in NSW involve prenuptial agreements.
  2. Around 30% of prenuptial agreements are contested in court due to claims of duress, lack of disclosure, or unfair terms.
  3. Legal costs for cases involving prenuptial agreements can range from $50,000 to $400,000.
  4. Court proceedings to resolve disputes over prenuptial agreements can last between 12-36 months.
  5. In 25% of cases, prenuptial agreements are set aside due to lack of independent legal advice or inadequate disclosure.
  6. 15% of prenuptial agreements are found to be unenforceable due to unconscionable conduct.
  7. 50% of disputes over prenuptial agreements involve claims of significant financial imbalance between the parties.
  8. Approximately 20% of cases involve prenuptial agreements that were not updated after major life events.
  9. 60% of property settlements with contested prenuptial agreements are resolved through court intervention.
  10. 10% of cases involving prenuptial agreements result in an appeal to a higher court.

Essential Resources: Government and Non-Profit Organizations

Government Resources

  1. NSW Government – Prenuptial Agreements Guidelines: https://www.familylaw.nsw.gov.au
  2. Family Court of Australia – Enforceability of Prenuptial Agreements: https://www.familycourt.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/fcoaweb/family-law-matters/property-and-finance/prenuptial-agreements/
  3. Legal Aid NSW – Guidance on Prenuptial Agreements: https://www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au
  4. NSW Courts – Validity of Prenuptial Agreements: https://www.courts.nsw.gov.au
  5. LawAccess NSW – Prenuptial Agreements in Property Settlements: https://www.lawaccess.nsw.gov.au

Non-Profit Organizations

Women's Legal Service NSW – Advice on Prenuptial Agreements: https://www.wlsnsw.org.au

Justice Connect – Legal Resources on Prenuptial Agreements: https://justiceconnect.org.au/resources/prenuptial-agreements/

Relationships Australia – Support for Prenuptial Agreement Disputes: https://www.relationships.org.au

Community Legal Centres NSW – Family Law Guidance: https://www.clcnsw.org.au

Lifeline Australia – Support for Individuals in Prenuptial Disputes: https://www.lifeline.org.au