When buying an off-the-plan property in NSW, clear and consistent communication between the developer and buyer is critical. Unfortunately, many buyers experience poor communication throughout the process, leading to confusion, delays, and unexpected financial burdens. Inadequate updates on construction progress, changes to project timelines, or unforeseen costs can leave buyers feeling anxious and unsure of what they’re getting into.
Developers may not always communicate clearly about essential aspects of the purchase, such as changes in design, delays in construction, or adjustments to settlement dates. When buyers are left in the dark, they may find themselves unprepared for key milestones, which can result in legal disputes, financial stress, and emotional strain. A well-communicated process is not just a courtesy; it’s essential for protecting the buyer’s interests.
In this article, we will explore the common communication breakdowns in off-the-plan purchases, highlight a real NSW court case where poor communication led to costly consequences, and provide strategies buyers can use to protect themselves from the risks associated with poor communication.
1. Lack of Updates on Construction Progress
One of the most frequent communication issues in off-the-plan purchases is the lack of regular updates on construction progress. Buyers are often left wondering how their property is coming along, only to discover late in the process that delays have occurred. This can lead to uncertainty about when the property will be ready for settlement, making it difficult for buyers to plan their finances or make living arrangements.
2. Changes to Design or Materials Not Communicated
Developers sometimes make changes to the design, layout, or materials of a property during construction, often without informing buyers in a timely manner. When these changes are significant—such as altering the size of rooms, switching to lower-quality materials, or eliminating certain features—it can result in disappointment or financial loss for buyers, especially if they had specific expectations.
3. Inconsistent Communication About Settlement Dates
Settlement is one of the most critical moments in an off-the-plan purchase, but poor communication can lead to confusion and last-minute financial panic. If developers fail to provide clear and consistent updates about the expected settlement date, buyers may struggle to arrange financing or finalize their living situations, leading to delays or penalties.
4. Failure to Communicate Additional Costs
Another common issue is the failure to inform buyers about unexpected costs that arise during the construction process. These costs may include changes to levies, additional charges for alterations, or fees related to delays in construction. When developers fail to communicate these costs early, buyers can find themselves facing financial stress when it comes time to settle.
The consequences of poor communication in off-the-plan purchases can be significant and far-reaching:
Introduction
In Carter v XYZ Developments [2020] NSWSC 782, a group of off-the-plan buyers in a Sydney apartment complex filed a class action against the developer after experiencing long delays and significant design changes that were not communicated. This case demonstrates how poor communication can lead to costly legal disputes and financial losses for buyers.
Executor’s Mismanagement
The buyers had entered into contracts for luxury apartments in what was marketed as a prestigious development in Sydney. They expected timely construction and had been promised high-quality finishes and spacious designs. However, the buyers soon realized that communication from the developer was sparse, with only occasional updates about the project’s progress. As the expected settlement date approached, the developer remained silent, leaving the buyers unsure of when their properties would be ready.
It wasn’t until the buyers reached out to the developer that they were informed of significant construction delays, which pushed the settlement date back by nearly a year. During this time, several buyers discovered that the developer had made substantial changes to the design and layout of their apartments—reducing balcony sizes and substituting lower-quality materials—without notifying them.
The buyers, frustrated by the lack of communication and transparency, tried to engage with the developer to address the delays and changes. However, the developer’s responses were slow and dismissive, with little effort made to explain the reasons for the delays or the design alterations. As the buyers became more anxious about the status of their properties, some sought legal advice, realizing that their only option might be to pursue legal action.
The buyers felt betrayed by the developer’s poor communication, particularly those who had made significant financial and personal plans around the original settlement date. Many had secured loans or sold their previous homes in anticipation of moving into the new apartments, only to be left in limbo as the developer remained unresponsive.
The buyers filed a class action against the developer, alleging breach of contract and misleading and deceptive conduct. They argued that the developer had failed to communicate crucial information about the delays and design changes and that this lack of communication had caused them financial loss and emotional distress.
The NSW Supreme Court reviewed the evidence, including correspondence between the buyers and the developer, and found that the developer had indeed failed to meet its obligations to provide timely and accurate communication. The court ruled in favor of the buyers, awarding them compensation to cover the costs of the delays, design changes, and additional financial burdens they had incurred due to the developer’s poor communication.
The financial impact on the buyers was substantial. Many had to pay rent or take out bridging loans to cover the extended construction period, and several buyers faced penalties from their banks for failing to settle on time. The court awarded a total of $1.5 million in compensation, divided among the buyers based on the severity of the delays and design changes.
However, the compensation did not fully cover the financial and emotional strain that the buyers had endured. Some buyers were forced to sell their properties at a loss, while others had to liquidate assets to cover unexpected costs related to the settlement delay.
Government Resources
Non-Profit Organisations