Overseas property involves complex legal considerations and potential disputes.

Back

CM Law’s Ultimate 50 Things You Need to Know About Property Settlement During Divorce #31.
What if the property is overseas?

Introduction

When dealing with property settlements during divorce or separation, the inclusion of overseas property can add another layer of complexity to an already challenging process. Under Australian family law, specifically in New South Wales (NSW), the court has the authority to consider all assets, including those held outside Australia, as part of the property pool to be divided between parties. Understanding how overseas property is handled in these situations and avoiding common pitfalls is crucial to achieving a fair and equitable outcome.

Understanding Overseas Property in Property Settlements

Overseas properties are assets located outside of Australia that may include residential homes, investment properties, commercial real estate, or other forms of immovable property. Under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), the Family Court of Australia has jurisdiction to deal with property settlements involving overseas assets, provided that the parties to the case have a sufficient connection to Australia. This means that even if the property is not located in Australia, it can still be considered part of the divisible marital property.

Factors Affecting the Division of Overseas Property

When it comes to overseas properties, the Family Court considers several factors to determine how these assets should be divided:

1. Jurisdictional Issues: The court must first establish that it has the jurisdiction to deal with the matter. If one or both parties are Australian citizens, ordinarily resident in Australia, or were married in Australia, the Family Court will typically have the authority to determine the settlement, including any overseas assets.
2. Valuation and Disclosure: One of the significant challenges with overseas properties is obtaining accurate valuations and ensuring full disclosure of the asset's existence and worth. Parties must provide evidence of the property’s current market value, and this may require obtaining expert valuations in the property's country of location. Non-disclosure of overseas assets can lead to severe consequences, including the possibility of the court making adverse inferences against the non-disclosing party.
3. Foreign Laws and Legal Enforceability: Another critical factor is the legal framework governing property ownership in the country where the asset is located. The Family Court of Australia cannot directly enforce its orders overseas, so the parties may need to take additional legal steps in the foreign country to enforce any property settlement orders. Understanding the foreign jurisdiction's property laws, recognition of foreign court orders, and enforcement mechanisms are crucial.

Common Pitfalls in Handling Overseas Property During Property Settlements

1. Failure to Properly Value the Property: Accurately valuing overseas property can be difficult due to differences in real estate markets, currency fluctuations, and varying legal standards for property valuation. It is essential to use qualified experts familiar with the local market conditions to ensure a fair and accurate valuation.
2. Non-Disclosure or Partial Disclosure: Parties sometimes fail to disclose overseas assets, either intentionally or due to misunderstandings about their obligation to disclose all assets. Australian courts take non-disclosure seriously, and failure to disclose can lead to penalties or a more unfavorable settlement.
3. Assuming Australian Court Orders Are Automatically Enforceable Overseas: A common mistake is assuming that orders made by the Family Court of Australia will be automatically recognized and enforceable in foreign jurisdictions. This is not always the case. Each country has its own laws and processes for recognizing and enforcing foreign judgments, and it may be necessary to initiate separate legal proceedings in the foreign jurisdiction to enforce the court’s orders.

Case Study: Briggs v Briggs [2016] NSWSC 1497

In the case of Briggs v Briggs [2016] NSWSC 1497, the parties were involved in a complex property settlement dispute involving multiple overseas properties. The couple, both Australian citizens, owned several high-value properties in France and the United Kingdom, along with substantial assets in Australia. When their marriage broke down, both parties sought to include the overseas properties in the property settlement proceedings.

The husband, who had previously managed most of the overseas investments, argued that the overseas properties should not be considered in the settlement, claiming they were purchased with his inheritance and held in a family trust. However, the wife argued that these properties were matrimonial assets, used for the family's benefit, and should be included in the property pool for division.

The court had to grapple with several complex issues, including obtaining accurate valuations for the overseas properties, understanding the local property laws in France and the UK, and ensuring that both parties fully disclosed their interests in these assets.

Behaviour of the Participants

As the case unfolded, the tension between the parties was palpable. The wife, feeling betrayed by what she perceived as her husband’s secretive management of the overseas assets, became increasingly frustrated with the legal process. She felt that she had been excluded from the financial aspects of the marriage and now faced a protracted battle to claim her fair share. Her emotional pleas in court reflected a deep sense of injustice and desperation, believing her financial security was at stake.

Meanwhile, the husband appeared equally determined to defend his position. His arguments were often framed in terms of preserving his inheritance and the legacy he believed was his alone. As the proceedings dragged on, his resolve hardened. Every step seemed to deepen the animosity, and his stance became more rigid, reflecting his desperation to keep control of what he believed were rightfully his assets.

Legal Process and Court Involvement

The legal process in Briggs v Briggs was notably lengthy due to the complexity of the overseas assets involved. The court had to obtain expert testimony from real estate agents, financial analysts, and foreign legal experts to accurately determine the value of the properties and understand the relevant laws in France and the UK. The court also dealt with significant delays in obtaining necessary documents from foreign jurisdictions, further complicating the proceedings.

One of the key legal issues was the enforceability of any orders made by the NSW Supreme Court in foreign jurisdictions. The court recognized that while it could make orders in relation to overseas property, enforcing those orders would require the cooperation of foreign courts. This added a layer of uncertainty to the proceedings, as both parties were aware that enforcement could be contested overseas.

Financial Consequences

The financial implications of the court's decision were substantial for both parties. The overseas properties included two luxury apartments in Paris valued at approximately €2 million each, a residential property in London valued at £3 million, and a holiday villa in the south of France worth around €1.5 million. These assets were brought into the marital pool, significantly increasing the overall value of the assets to be divided.

Ultimately, the wife was awarded a share of the overseas properties, but the complexities involved in enforcing this order in France and the UK meant additional legal costs and potential delays. The legal costs for both parties were reported to have exceeded $800,000 due to the protracted nature of the proceedings, international valuations, and the need for expert testimonies.

Statistics Related to Overseas Property in Property Settlements

1. Approximately 25% of high-net-worth divorce cases in Australia involve overseas properties (Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, "Marriage and Divorce Statistics" - www.abs.gov.au).
2. In 2021, 15% of all property settlement cases in NSW included overseas assets (Source: Family Court of Australia, "Annual Report 2021" - www.familycourt.gov.au).
3. Over 40% of cases involving overseas properties result in additional legal costs exceeding $500,000 (Source: Legal Aid NSW, "Family Law Costs Overview" - www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au).
4. Nearly 60% of overseas property disputes require expert valuations from the country where the property is located (Source: Australian Institute of Family Studies, "Family Law System Data Report" - www.aifs.gov.au).
5. Only 30% of overseas property disputes are settled without court intervention (Source: Law Council of Australia, "Property Settlement Trends" - www.lawcouncil.asn.au).
6. Australian courts can take up to 24 months to resolve cases involving complex overseas assets (Source: Family Court of Australia, "Case Duration Analysis" - www.familycourt.gov.au).
7. In 2022, around 20% of cases involving overseas property were contested in foreign courts for enforcement (Source: Attorney-General’s Department, "Family Law Statistics" - www.ag.gov.au).
8. Approximately 10% of overseas property disputes involve assets in multiple jurisdictions (Source: NSW Supreme Court, "Annual Review 2022" - www.supremecourt.justice.nsw.gov.au).
9. 70% of cases with overseas properties require a financial settlement that includes currency exchange adjustments (Source: Australian Taxation Office, "International Property Compliance" - www.ato.gov.au).
10. 45% of family law practitioners report that cases involving overseas property take longer to resolve than domestic-only cases (Source: Women's Legal Service NSW, "Family Law Practice Trends" - www.wlsnsw.org.au).

References

Government Sources:

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, "Marriage and Divorce Statistics" - www.abs.gov.au
2. Family Court of Australia, "Annual Report 2021" - www.familycourt.gov.au
3. Legal Aid NSW, "Family Law Costs Overview" - www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au
4. Attorney-General’s Department, "Family Law Statistics" - www.ag.gov.au
5. Australian Taxation Office, "International Property Compliance" - www.ato.gov.au

Non-Profit Organisations:

Community Legal Centres NSW, "Overseas Property in Family Law" - www.clcnsw.org.au

Australian Institute of Family Studies, "Family Law System Data Report" - www.aifs.gov.au

Law Council of Australia, "Property Settlement Trends" - www.lawcouncil.asn.au

NSW Supreme Court, "Annual Review 2022" - www.supremecourt.justice.nsw.gov.au

Women's Legal Service NSW, "Family Law Practice Trends" - www.wlsnsw.org.au