When purchasing a property off-the-plan in NSW, buyers often focus on the excitement of a future home or investment. However, one of the biggest financial risks that can affect these buyers is interest rate rises between the time of signing the contract and when the property is ready for settlement. Because off-the-plan purchases typically have long settlement periods—often up to two years—buyers may find themselves facing significantly higher mortgage repayments if interest rates rise during this time.
Interest rate increases can create financial strain for buyers who planned their budgets based on the lower rates available when they initially signed the contract. This can lead to higher monthly repayments, difficulties in securing a loan, or even the need to sell the property at a loss if the buyer cannot meet the new financial obligations. Rising interest rates can also impact property values, making it harder for buyers to achieve their expected capital growth or rental returns.
In this article, we’ll explore how interest rate rises affect off-the-plan buyers in NSW, present a real court case where rate hikes led to financial difficulties, and offer strategies for protecting yourself against this risk.
1. Increased Mortgage Repayments
One of the most direct impacts of rising interest rates is the increase in monthly mortgage repayments. For off-the-plan buyers, who sign contracts long before settlement, a rise in interest rates can significantly alter their financial situation. What seemed like affordable repayments when they first secured financing may become unmanageable by the time settlement arrives.
2. Difficulty Securing Finance at Settlement
Rising interest rates can also affect a buyer’s ability to secure financing when the property is ready for settlement. Buyers who received pre-approval for a loan based on lower rates may find that their borrowing capacity is reduced, leaving them unable to obtain the loan amount they need. This can lead to delays in settlement or even result in the buyer having to forfeit their deposit.
3. Negative Equity
If interest rates rise significantly, it can lead to a slowdown in property price growth or even a decline in values. Buyers who planned to sell or refinance their off-the-plan property after settlement may find that the property’s value has not appreciated as expected, leaving them in a position of negative equity—where the loan amount exceeds the property’s market value.
4. Impact on Rental Returns
Investors purchasing off-the-plan properties may also face reduced rental returns due to rising interest rates. Higher borrowing costs can erode profitability, making it harder to achieve positive cash flow from the property. If rental yields do not increase in line with rising interest rates, investors may struggle to cover their mortgage repayments.
Interest rate rises can have serious financial and legal consequences for off-the-plan buyers, particularly those who are unprepared for the increased costs:
Introduction
In Smith v ABC Developments [2022] NSWSC 1503, a group of off-the-plan buyers in Sydney experienced significant financial hardship after interest rates rose during the two-year construction period of their apartment complex. The case highlights the risks that interest rate rises can pose to buyers who are locked into long settlement periods.
Executor’s Mismanagement
The buyers had signed contracts to purchase luxury apartments in a development located in Sydney’s inner west. At the time of signing, interest rates were historically low, and the buyers received pre-approval for their loans based on these low rates. However, during the two years it took for the development to be completed, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) increased interest rates several times, leading to a sharp rise in borrowing costs.
By the time the apartments were ready for settlement, interest rates had risen by 2%, which resulted in a significant increase in the buyers’ monthly mortgage repayments. Several buyers found that they no longer qualified for the same loan amount they had been pre-approved for, and they struggled to secure the financing needed to settle on their apartments.
The buyers, unprepared for the sharp rise in interest rates, attempted to renegotiate their loan terms with their lenders. However, many were offered loans with much higher monthly repayments, which they could not afford. Some buyers sought alternative financing options, but they were forced to take out high-interest personal loans or sell other assets to cover the cost of settlement.
As financial pressure mounted, several buyers reached out to the developer, asking for an extension on the settlement deadline or a reduction in the purchase price. However, the developer refused to make any concessions, citing the terms of the contract. Faced with the prospect of losing their deposits, some buyers were forced to sell their apartments at a loss before even settling.
The buyers filed a class action against both the developer and their lenders, arguing that they had not been adequately informed about the risks of rising interest rates. They claimed that the developer had failed to provide sufficient warnings about potential financial difficulties during the long settlement period and that the lenders had misled them by offering pre-approvals based on unrealistically low interest rates.
The court reviewed the evidence, including correspondence between the buyers, lenders, and developers. While the judge acknowledged the financial hardship faced by the buyers, the court found that the developer and lenders had acted within the legal framework and that the buyers had assumed the risk of interest rate rises when they signed the contracts.
The financial consequences for the buyers were severe. Many were forced to sell their apartments at a loss, while others took on additional debt to cover the increased mortgage repayments. The court did not award compensation to the buyers, leaving them to bear the full financial burden of the interest rate rises.
Some buyers who were unable to settle lost their deposits, while others faced years of financial strain due to higher loan repayments. The case underscored the risks of purchasing off-the-plan properties during periods of low interest rates, particularly when settlement is delayed.
Government Resources
Non-Profit Organisations