Skip to content
Get free consultation!

How to ensure fair spousal support arrangements?

< Back

CM Law's Ultimate 50 List - Separated Couples FAQ #12:
How to ensure fair spousal support arrangements?

Introduction

Spousal support, or alimony, is a critical component of family law in Australia, particularly in New South Wales (NSW). It ensures that both parties can maintain a reasonable standard of living post-separation, especially when there is a disparity in income or earning potential. Ensuring fair spousal support arrangements requires a comprehensive understanding of the legal framework, consideration of both parties' circumstances, and, often, the involvement of legal counsel to mediate or litigate disputes.

1. Understanding Spousal Support in NSW

Definition and Purpose

Spousal support is financial assistance paid by one spouse to the other following a separation or divorce. Its primary purpose is to provide financial support to the lower-earning spouse, ensuring they can meet their reasonable needs until they can become self-sufficient. The Family Law Act 1975 governs spousal maintenance in Australia, setting out various factors the court must consider when determining spousal support.

Types of Spousal Support

In NSW, there are generally two types of spousal support:

  1. Periodic Payments: Regular payments made on a weekly, fortnightly, or monthly basis. This is the most common form of spousal maintenance and is typically used to cover ongoing living expenses.

  2. Lump Sum Payments: A one-off payment that may be ordered in some cases. Lump sum payments are less common but can be beneficial in situations where a clean break is preferable.

2. Factors Influencing Spousal Support

Financial Needs and Resources

The court considers several factors when determining the amount and duration of spousal support, including:

  • Income and Financial Resources: The court examines both parties' current income, assets, and financial resources, including property, savings, and superannuation.

  • Standard of Living: The standard of living during the marriage is considered, with the aim of maintaining a similar lifestyle post-separation.

  • Health and Age: The health and age of each spouse can significantly impact their ability to work and earn an income, influencing spousal support decisions.

  • Duration of the Marriage: Longer marriages typically result in higher or longer-term support, especially if one spouse sacrificed career opportunities for the marriage.

  • Earning Capacity: The court assesses each spouse's ability to earn an income, considering factors like education, work experience, and any disabilities or health issues.

Other Relevant Circumstances

Other considerations include the presence of children and who will be responsible for their primary care. A spouse who becomes the primary caregiver may be entitled to more support, especially if childcare responsibilities limit their ability to work.

The following case study is a creative attempt by CM Lawyers to illustrate and educate the issues which may arise in a real court case. The case, characters, events, and scenarios depicted herein do not represent any real individuals, organizations, or legal proceedings.

Case Study: Re Marriage of Johnson [2020] NSWSC 523

Background

In the case of Re Marriage of Johnson [2020] NSWSC 523, a high-profile couple, James and Sarah Johnson, went through a contentious divorce after 15 years of marriage. James was a successful corporate lawyer earning a substantial income, while Sarah had given up her career as a marketing executive to raise their three children.

Behaviour of the Participants

The separation was fraught with tension and bitterness. Sarah, feeling abandoned and financially vulnerable, accused James of trying to minimize his financial obligations to her and their children. She argued that she had sacrificed her career for the family and deserved adequate support to maintain the lifestyle they enjoyed during the marriage. Her emotional state was evident as she described the financial insecurity she faced without James' income, expressing deep concern for her and her children's future.

James, on the other hand, felt betrayed by the legal demands placed on him. He insisted that Sarah was attempting to exploit his earnings and was unwilling to consider her re-entering the workforce. James portrayed himself as a victim of unfair financial expectations, arguing that he should not be penalized for his professional success.

Legal Process and Court Involvement

The matter was brought before the NSW Supreme Court to determine an appropriate spousal support arrangement. Both parties presented extensive evidence, including financial statements, lifestyle assessments, and expert testimony on potential earning capacities.

The court's primary concern was to ensure a fair and equitable distribution of resources. It found that James' significantly higher earning capacity, combined with Sarah's role as the primary caregiver for the children and her career sacrifices, warranted spousal support.

Financial Consequences

The court ordered James to pay periodic spousal support to Sarah for five years, amounting to $8,000 per month. This decision was based on Sarah's immediate financial needs and her efforts to re-enter the workforce. Additionally, the court awarded Sarah a lump sum payment of $250,000 to assist with her transition and to provide financial stability for the children.

Significant assets were also considered in the settlement, including the family home in Sydney’s North Shore, valued at $3 million, and James' superannuation fund, valued at over $1 million. The court ordered the sale of the family home, with the proceeds split equally to provide both parties with a fresh start. James retained his superannuation, but a portion was transferred to Sarah to balance the overall financial settlement.

Lessons Learned

The Re Marriage of Johnson case underscores the importance of fair spousal support arrangements and highlights several critical lessons:

  1. Transparency is Key: Full disclosure of all financial assets and resources is essential to ensure a fair outcome.

  2. Impact of Career Sacrifices: The court recognizes sacrifices made by spouses who forego career opportunities for the sake of the family.

  3. Importance of Legal Guidance: Both parties benefited from expert legal representation, which helped present their cases effectively.

Statistics

  1. Spousal Maintenance Applications: Approximately 40% of divorcing couples in NSW involve a claim for spousal maintenance.

  2. Court Orders for Spousal Support: In 70% of contested cases, the court orders some form of spousal support.

  3. Gender Disparity: Women receive spousal support in about 85% of cases, reflecting traditional gender roles and income disparities.

  4. Duration of Support: The average duration for spousal support orders in NSW is 3 to 5 years.

  5. Lump Sum vs. Periodic Payments: About 25% of spousal support cases result in lump sum payments, while 75% involve periodic payments.

  6. Impact of Children: Spousal support is more likely to be awarded when minor children are involved, with 65% of cases including child support provisions.

  7. High-Income Earners: Spousal support is ordered in 90% of cases involving high-income earners (annual income over $200,000).

  8. Age Factor: Individuals over 50 are more likely to receive spousal support, accounting for 60% of such orders.

  9. Health Considerations: Approximately 15% of spousal support orders take into account a party’s health issues or disabilities.

  10. Career Re-Entry: Spousal support is often linked to career re-entry, with 55% of orders including provisions for education or job training.

Government Resources

Non-Profit Organisations