Off-the-plan purchases in NSW often promise a modern and luxurious living experience, but hidden environmental issues can quickly turn that dream into a costly and hazardous reality. Whether it’s contaminated soil, flooding risks, or proximity to industrial areas, environmental factors can impact the safety, livability, and value of the property. Unfortunately, many of these concerns are not adequately disclosed during the sales process, leaving buyers to deal with the financial and health implications long after they’ve committed to the purchase.
Environmental issues may include anything from poor air quality and noise pollution to contamination from nearby industrial sites or inadequate stormwater management systems. These problems not only affect the property’s value but can also pose significant health risks to residents. Moreover, environmental issues often lead to legal disputes between buyers and developers, as buyers seek compensation for issues that were not disclosed upfront.
In this article, we’ll explore the environmental risks that can affect off-the-plan purchases in NSW, highlight a real court case where environmental issues caused financial and health problems for buyers, and provide practical advice on how to protect yourself from these hazards.
1. Contaminated Land
Developers sometimes build new residential projects on land that was previously used for industrial or commercial purposes, which may leave the soil contaminated with hazardous substances like heavy metals, asbestos, or chemicals. Buyers may not be aware of these risks until after settlement, when environmental assessments reveal the contamination. Remediation can be extremely costly, and in severe cases, the land may be deemed unsafe for residential use.
2. Flooding and Water Damage
Flood-prone areas or poor stormwater drainage systems can lead to water damage in new developments. Off-the-plan buyers may not be informed of the property’s flood risk, especially if they are unfamiliar with the area. Flooding can lead to property damage, mold growth, and ongoing maintenance costs, as well as reducing the property’s value.
3. Proximity to Industrial Zones
Properties near industrial zones or major roads may be subject to noise pollution, poor air quality, and other environmental hazards. Buyers who are not informed about the proximity to these areas may experience significant disruptions to their quality of life, as well as health risks from long-term exposure to pollution.
4. Lack of Green Space
Developers may promise green spaces and parks in the vicinity of a development, but in some cases, these promises go unfulfilled. The absence of green spaces can negatively affect the livability of the area, contribute to poor air quality, and reduce the overall value of the property.
5. Noise Pollution
Living near construction zones, highways, or airports can lead to ongoing noise pollution, which affects health and well-being. Buyers may not be made aware of nearby sources of noise during the purchasing process, leaving them to deal with the disturbances long after they’ve settled.
Environmental issues can have far-reaching consequences for off-the-plan buyers, affecting not only the property’s value but also the health and safety of the residents.
Introduction
In Johnson v XYZ Developments [2020] NSWSC 978, a group of buyers in a new residential development in Western Sydney took legal action against the developer after discovering that the land their homes were built on was contaminated with hazardous chemicals. The case illustrates the financial and health toll that environmental issues can have on off-the-plan buyers.
Executor’s Mismanagement
The buyers had purchased homes in what was marketed as a sustainable and eco-friendly development. The developer promoted the project as being built with environmental considerations in mind, offering green spaces and energy-efficient features. However, after settlement, the buyers began to notice unusual odors coming from the soil and experienced unexplained health issues, such as respiratory problems and skin irritations.
An environmental assessment revealed that the land had previously been used as an industrial site and was contaminated with hazardous chemicals, including lead and asbestos. The developer had failed to disclose the land’s contamination history to the buyers, and no remediation had been carried out before construction began.
The buyers were shocked and distressed when they learned about the contamination. They contacted the developer, demanding immediate remediation and compensation for the health issues they were experiencing. However, the developer denied responsibility, claiming that the land had been inspected and deemed safe before construction.
Faced with mounting health problems and the prospect of costly remediation, the buyers sought legal advice and decided to file a class action against the developer. The financial and emotional toll of the situation was severe, as many buyers had invested their life savings into these homes, only to find that they were living in a hazardous environment.
The buyers filed a class action in the NSW Supreme Court, alleging that the developer had engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by failing to disclose the contamination of the land. They argued that the developer had a legal obligation to inform them of any environmental risks associated with the property.
The court reviewed the evidence, including environmental reports and expert testimony from health professionals. The judge found that the developer had breached its duty of care to the buyers by failing to carry out proper environmental assessments and disclose the contamination. The court ruled in favor of the buyers, ordering the developer to pay compensation for the health issues, remediation costs, and the devaluation of the properties.
The financial impact on the buyers was significant. The court awarded $4.5 million in compensation, which was divided among the buyers based on the severity of the contamination and the costs of remediation. However, the compensation did not fully cover the long-term health care costs for some of the buyers, nor did it completely offset the emotional and financial toll of the legal battle.
Many buyers were left facing the ongoing challenge of remediating their land, which involved removing contaminated soil and installing protective barriers. Some buyers were forced to move out of their homes temporarily, incurring additional living expenses. The property values also dropped significantly due to the contamination, making it difficult for the buyers to sell or rent out their homes.
Government Resources
Non-Profit Organisations