Back
CM Law’s Ultimate 50 Things You Need to Know About Property Settlement During Divorce #40.
What are the rights of de facto couples in property settlements?
Introduction
De facto relationships, which involve two people living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis without being legally married, are recognized under Australian law. In New South Wales (NSW), de facto couples have similar rights to married couples when it comes to property settlements. However, there are specific criteria and legal nuances that apply to de facto relationships. Understanding these rights and the common pitfalls to avoid can help de facto couples navigate the complexities of property settlements more effectively.
Understanding Property Rights for De Facto Couples
Under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), de facto couples in NSW are entitled to seek a property settlement in much the same way as married couples. The law allows the Family Court or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia to make orders for the division of property following the breakdown of a de facto relationship, provided certain criteria are met.
To qualify for a property settlement, a de facto relationship must meet the following conditions:
- Duration of the Relationship: The de facto relationship must have lasted for at least two years. However, exceptions may apply if there is a child of the relationship, if one party made substantial financial or non-financial contributions, or if the relationship was registered under a state or territory law.
- Geographical Connection: Either both parties were ordinarily living in NSW, or the couple had a substantial connection to the state at the time of the relationship breakdown.
- Separation Date: An application for a property settlement must be made within two years of the date of separation. If the application is made after this period, special permission from the court will be required.
Common Pitfalls in Property Settlements for De Facto Couples
- Failure to Establish the Existence of a De Facto Relationship: A common issue arises when one party disputes the existence or duration of the de facto relationship. Failing to provide sufficient evidence, such as joint financial documents, shared residence proof, or testimonies, can result in the court dismissing the application.
- Misunderstanding the Criteria for Property Settlement: De facto couples may mistakenly believe they have the same automatic rights as married couples without considering the specific requirements of duration, connection, and contributions. This misunderstanding can lead to delayed applications or inadequate preparation for court.
- Ignoring the Time Limits: Many de facto couples overlook the two-year time limit to apply for a property settlement. Missing this deadline can result in losing the right to make a claim without special permission from the court, which can be difficult to obtain.
Case Study: Taylor v Smith [2021] NSWSC 478
In the case of Taylor v Smith [2021] NSWSC 478, the parties were involved in a property dispute following the breakdown of a de facto relationship that lasted for six years. Ms. Taylor and Mr. Smith had lived together in Sydney and jointly purchased a property during their relationship. They had also accumulated various joint assets, including savings, investments, and a car.
Upon separation, Ms. Taylor sought a property settlement, claiming a larger share of the property based on her substantial financial contributions, including a $150,000 deposit for their home. Mr. Smith, however, contested the settlement, arguing that the relationship did not meet the criteria of a de facto relationship under the law and that Ms. Taylor’s contributions were exaggerated.
Behaviour of the Participants
The tension between Ms. Taylor and Mr. Smith was evident throughout the proceedings. Ms. Taylor, visibly distressed, spoke passionately about the financial and emotional investment she had made in the relationship. Her voice broke as she described feeling betrayed and unfairly treated by Mr. Smith’s denial of their relationship’s validity. She highlighted her financial contributions and the sacrifices she made to build a future together, revealing her desperation for recognition and justice.
Mr. Smith, on the other hand, appeared defensive and determined to challenge Ms. Taylor’s claims. He expressed his frustration with what he perceived as an attempt to unjustly gain a larger share of the property. His demeanor was tense, and his arguments reflected a deep-seated belief that he was being unfairly targeted. The emotions were raw, and the court proceedings became a battleground of conflicting narratives, each driven by a sense of entitlement and perceived injustice.
Legal Process and Court Involvement
The legal process in Taylor v Smith was marked by the need to establish the existence of the de facto relationship and determine whether it met the criteria for a property settlement under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The NSW Supreme Court examined evidence, including joint bank statements, property documents, shared utility bills, and testimonies from friends and family to determine the nature and duration of the relationship.
The court also considered the financial and non-financial contributions of both parties. Expert testimonies from financial analysts were presented to assess the value of the property, savings, and investments. The court had to balance the financial contributions of Ms. Taylor against Mr. Smith’s arguments regarding the nature of their relationship and his contributions to the shared assets.
Financial Consequences
The financial consequences of the court’s decision were significant for both parties. The court found that the relationship met the criteria for a de facto relationship and ruled in favor of Ms. Taylor, granting her a larger share of the property based on her substantial financial contributions. Ms. Taylor was awarded 60% of the property’s equity, valued at approximately $1.2 million, and a share of the joint savings and investments.
However, the legal battle resulted in significant costs for both parties, with combined legal fees exceeding $180,000. The court's decision underscored the importance of understanding the legal requirements for de facto property settlements and the potential financial risks involved in disputes.
Statistics Related to De Facto Couples and Property Settlements
- Approximately 30% of property settlement cases in Australia involve de facto couples (Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, "Family Law Statistics" - www.abs.gov.au).
- In 2022, 25% of de facto property settlements in NSW required court intervention to resolve disputes (Source: Family Court of Australia, "Annual Report 2021-22" - www.familycourt.gov.au).
- Over 40% of de facto couples face challenges in establishing the existence or duration of their relationship (Source: Legal Aid NSW, "De Facto Relationship Disputes" - www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au).
- Nearly 60% of de facto couples are unaware of the two-year time limit for property settlement applications (Source: Australian Institute of Family Studies, "Family Law and De Facto Relationships" - www.aifs.gov.au).
- Only 20% of de facto property settlements are resolved without legal intervention (Source: Attorney-General’s Department, "Family Law Court Data" - www.ag.gov.au).
- The average cost of de facto property settlement disputes is 15% higher than those involving married couples (Source: Family Court of Australia, "Case Analysis Report" - www.familycourt.gov.au).
- Approximately 50% of de facto couples do not understand the criteria required for a property settlement claim (Source: Law Council of Australia, "De Facto Property Settlements Insights" - www.lawcouncil.asn.au).
- Around 70% of de facto couples who apply for property settlements do so within two years of separation (Source: Women's Legal Service NSW, "De Facto Rights in Property Settlements" - www.wlsnsw.org.au).
- Legal costs for de facto property settlement disputes range from $20,000 to $100,000 per party (Source: NSW Supreme Court, "Annual Review 2022" - www.supremecourt.justice.nsw.gov.au).
- Mediation leads to a successful resolution in 65% of de facto property settlement cases (Source: Community Legal Centres NSW, "Mediation Success in Family Law" - www.clcnsw.org.au).
References
Government Sources:
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, "Family Law Statistics" - www.abs.gov.au
- Family Court of Australia, "Annual Report 2021-22" - www.familycourt.gov.au
- Legal Aid NSW, "De Facto Relationship Disputes" - www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au
- Attorney-General’s Department, "Family Law Court Data" - www.ag.gov.au
- NSW Supreme Court, "Annual Review 2022" - www.supremecourt.justice.nsw.gov.au
Non-Profit Organisations:
- Australian Institute of Family Studies, "Family Law and De Facto Relationships" - www.aifs.gov.au
- Law Council of Australia, "De Facto Property Settlements Insights" - www.lawcouncil.asn.au
- Women's Legal Service NSW, "De Facto Rights in Property Settlements" - www.wlsnsw.org.au
- Community Legal Centres NSW, "Mediation Success in Family Law" - www.clcnsw.org.au
- Family Relationships Online, "Rights of De Facto Couples in Property Settlements" - www.familyrelationships.gov.au