When purchasing an off-the-plan property in NSW, buyers expect a brand-new home that adheres to all necessary safety and building regulations. However, the discovery of building code violations after the property is completed can lead to financial stress, legal disputes, and, in some cases, dangerous living conditions. Building code violations are breaches of the established construction standards and regulations meant to ensure safety, structural integrity, and habitability.
For off-the-plan buyers, these violations often come as a surprise after settlement, when issues such as fire safety non-compliance, electrical faults, or structural weaknesses are uncovered. Not only do these violations result in costly repairs, but they also pose a risk to the buyer's safety and the property’s value. Unfortunately, it can take months or even years for these issues to surface, leaving buyers vulnerable after they’ve already made their financial commitment.
In this article, we’ll explore the common types of building code violations that affect off-the-plan purchases in NSW, highlight a real court case where code violations led to significant costs for buyers, and offer practical advice on how to protect yourself from these risks.
1. Fire Safety Non-Compliance
Fire safety is one of the most critical aspects of building regulations, and non-compliance with fire safety codes can endanger lives. Common violations include insufficient fire exits, faulty sprinkler systems, and inadequate fire-resistant materials used in walls and ceilings. For off-the-plan buyers, discovering that their building does not meet fire safety standards can lead to expensive retrofitting and legal action.
2. Structural Deficiencies
Buildings are required to meet strict standards for structural integrity to ensure the safety and longevity of the property. Violations in this area can include poorly constructed foundations, inadequate load-bearing walls, and substandard materials. These issues may not be immediately visible but can lead to significant repair costs if discovered later.
3. Electrical and Plumbing Code Violations
Poor electrical wiring or non-compliant plumbing systems can result in dangerous conditions, including electrical fires or water damage. Violations such as improper grounding of electrical systems, substandard piping, or non-compliant hot water systems can be costly to fix and may require the involvement of multiple tradespeople.
4. Accessibility Code Violations
NSW building codes mandate that certain accessibility features, such as ramps and wide doorways, be included in new developments. Failure to comply with these regulations can lead to fines and the need for costly retrofits to bring the building up to standard.
5. Energy Efficiency and Environmental Code Violations
With increasing emphasis on sustainability, NSW has strict energy efficiency requirements for new buildings. Violations in this area include improper insulation, non-compliant windows, and inefficient heating or cooling systems. These issues can affect the livability and ongoing costs of the property.
Building code violations can lead to a range of financial and legal consequences for off-the-plan buyers:
Introduction
In Thompson v ABC Developments [2021] NSWSC 1085, a group of off-the-plan buyers in a new residential complex in Sydney took legal action against the developer after discovering multiple building code violations. The case highlights the financial and emotional toll that code violations can take on buyers.
Executor’s Mismanagement
The buyers had purchased luxury apartments in a high-rise development that was marketed as being built to the highest safety and quality standards. However, shortly after moving in, they began to notice issues with the building, including cracks in the walls, faulty electrical wiring, and leaks in the plumbing. Concerned about the safety and livability of their homes, the buyers hired an independent building inspector, who uncovered a range of serious building code violations.
The inspection revealed that the fire safety systems were non-compliant, with missing sprinkler heads and inadequate fire exits. The building’s foundations were also found to be unstable, posing a risk to the structural integrity of the entire complex. Additionally, the electrical wiring throughout the building was substandard, increasing the risk of electrical fires.
The buyers, shocked by the extent of the code violations, immediately contacted the developer to demand repairs and compensation. However, the developer was slow to respond and denied responsibility, claiming that the building had passed all necessary inspections before settlement. Frustrated by the developer’s lack of action, the buyers sought legal advice and decided to take the matter to court.
As the legal process unfolded, the buyers experienced significant financial and emotional stress. Many were forced to move out of their apartments due to safety concerns, while others faced the prospect of covering the cost of extensive repairs. The buyers also had to deal with the uncertainty of whether they would be able to recover their losses through the legal system.
The buyers filed a class action against the developer, alleging that they had failed to comply with NSW building codes and had misled the buyers about the safety and quality of the construction. The NSW Supreme Court reviewed the evidence, including expert testimony from building inspectors and engineers.
The court found that the developer had indeed breached NSW building regulations by failing to meet fire safety, structural, and electrical code requirements. The judge ruled in favor of the buyers, ordering the developer to cover the cost of repairs and pay compensation for the financial and emotional hardship caused by the violations.
The financial impact on the buyers was significant. The court awarded compensation totaling $3.5 million, which was divided among the buyers based on the severity of the violations and the cost of repairs. However, the compensation did not fully cover the buyers’ losses, particularly for those who had to move out of their apartments temporarily or sell at a reduced price due to the violations.
The buyers also faced ongoing financial strain as they dealt with the disruption to their lives and the cost of making their homes safe. Some buyers were forced to take out loans to cover the cost of repairs, while others had to liquidate assets to make ends meet.
Government Resources
Non-Profit Organisations